A few good commentaries on what last week’s midterm election results mean for reproductive rights:
Ms Magazine: notes that 13 of the Democratic house losses were anti-choice Democrats defeated by anti-choice Republicans; “Perhaps read telling, 24 House Democrats who lost had voted yes on the .”
Lisa Hymas at Grist: points out that at least 10 governorships have flipped from pro-choice to anti-choice.
Miriam at Nuestra Vida, Nuestra Voz: explains that:
In the aftermath of the election, the National Latina Institute will focus on saving the landmark health care law which will cover an estimated 9 million Latinos and increase funding for community health centers – a lifeline to many in our neighborhoods.
Will at Amplify: . Will (depressingly) predicts:
The 112th Congress will be dominated by fights over social issues, from abortion to family planning to abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. Two years from now, we will look back on November 2, 2010, as the day that far-right Republicans used a wave of economic frustration to usher in the most anti-choice, anti-sex ed, anti-LGBT, anti-family planning, anti-contraception Congress in our nation’s history.
Jodi Jacobson at RH Reality Check: . Jodi also has a bummer of a prediction: “We will see almost immediately a range of efforts to focus on restricting reproductive and sexual health and rights.”
Dionne Searcey at the Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog: (found via ). The fetal personhood amendment in Colorado that was defeated by a 3-1 margin. Searcey notes that a similar measure is on the ballot in Mississippi next year.
Nancy Northup at the Center for Reproductive Rights: , declares that “We will continue to work for the day when reproductive rights, like First Amendment rights, are protected from the outcome of elections.”