Considering the Risks of Egg Donation

By Rachel Walden |

Earlier this month, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed into a law a bill, , which requires advertisements seeking egg donors for fertility treatment to include a notice about the possible adverse health effects of egg donation.

Such advertisements must contain standard warning language that there may be risks associated with human egg donation, and advise potential donors that they are required to receive specifics on the known risks before signing a legally binding contract. The required language also recommends consulting with one’s physician prior to donation.

The state already had a law requiring such a warning summary be provided to women donating eggs for research purposes. That existing law also sets out the specifics of the warning to be provided to women prior to signing a contract for donation. The warning needs to consist of “medically accurate disclosures” concerning the potential risks associated with the surgical procedure for egg retrieval as well as the “drugs, medications, and hormones” prescribed for ovarian stimulation during the process.

Relatedly, one publisher of classroom materials has recently released a book on the topic of egg donation intended for a young audience. is listed as being intended for grades 7-12, and at a 6th grade reading level. The book seems focused on egg donation for fertility (not research) purposes, with the description noting that it “explains the current controversy” as well as “the basic science behind egg harvesting and in vitro fertilization and describing the process donors go through to help other women conceive.” Potential health risks and ethical issues are also apparently covered.

For read on the potential health concerns associated with egg donation, see on the topic, and Egg Donation for IVF and Stem Cell Research: Time to Weigh the Risks to Women’s Health.

4 Comments

  1. Kiki says:

    Diane Beeson from the Alliance for Humane Biotechnology has written a great critical review of the book — you can ().

  2. Andrea says:

    I think that’s a good law, and that it should be a federal law.

    I was surprised to learn about the very real . I never thought the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation would as high as 10 percent, or that 1.5 percent of egg donation retrievals resulted in the need for hospital care. To me, that’s awfully high!

    Making the law federal would mean that women all over the U.S. would have the right to informed consent instead of just ones in California.

  3. What i do not understood is actually how you’re now not really a lot read neatly-appreciated than you
    might be now. You are very intelligent. You know thus significantly in the case off this matter, made me individually believe it from numerous various angles.

    Its lkke women and men don’t seem to be interested until it is one thing to do
    with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs excellent. Always handle it up!

Comments for this post are closed.